Simply Aging

References

  1. V. N. Gladyshev et al., Disagreement on foundational principles of biological aging. PNAS Nexus 3, pgae499 (2024).

  2. V. N. Gladyshev, Aging: Progressive decline in fitness due to the rising deleteriome adjusted by genetic, environmental, and stochastic processes. Aging Cell. 15, 594–602 (2016).

  3. V. N. Gladyshev, On the cause of aging and control of lifespan: Heterogeneity leads to inevitable damage accumulation, causing aging; control of damage composition and rate of accumulation define lifespan. BioEssays 34, 925–929 (2012).

  4. V. N. Gladyshev, The origin of aging: Imperfectness-driven non-random damage defines the aging process and control of lifespan. Trends Genet. 29, 506–512 (2013).

  5. V. N. Gladyshev et al., Molecular damage in aging. Nat Aging. 1, 1096–1106 (2021).

  6. E. Schrödinger, What Is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell (Cambridge University Press, 1944).

  7. L. Boltzmann, On the relationship between the second fundamental theorem of the mechanical theory of heat and probability calculations regarding the conditions for thermal equilibrium (1877).

  8. T. B. L. Kirkwood, Evolution of ageing. Nature 270, 301–304 (1977).

  9. G. Nicolis, I. Prigogine, Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order Through Fluctuations (Wiley, 1977).

  10. S. Horvath, DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 14, R115 (2013).

  11. M. Moqri et al., Biomarkers of Aging Consortium. Biomarkers of aging for the identification and evaluation of longevity interventions. Cell. 186, 3758–3775 (2023).

  12. J. R. Poganik et al., Biological age is increased by stress and restored upon recovery. Cell Metab. 35, 807–820.e5 (2023).

  13. L. Ferrucci, N. Barzilai, D. W. Belsky, V. N. Gladyshev, How to measure biological aging in humans. Nat. Med. 31, 1057 (2025).

  14. V. N. Gladyshev, The ground zero of organismal life and aging. Trends Mol. Med. 27, 11–19 (2021).

  15. C. Kerepesi, B. Zhang, S. G. Lee, A. Trapp, V. N. Gladyshev, Epigenetic clocks reveal a rejuvenation event during embryogenesis followed by aging. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg6082 (2021).

  16. A. Trapp, C. Kerepesi, V. N. Gladyshev, Profiling epigenetic age in single cells. Nat. Aging 1, 1189–1201 (2021).

  17. E. D. Kinzina, D. I. Podolskiy, S. E. Dmitriev, V. N. Gladyshev, Patterns of aging biomarkers, mortality, and damaging mutations illuminate the beginning of aging and causes of early-life mortality. Cell Rep. 29, 4276–4284.e3 (2019).

  18. P. B. Medawar, An Unsolved Problem of Biology (H. K. Lewis, 1952).

  19. G. C. Williams, Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11, 398–411 (1957).

  20. W. D. Hamilton, The moulding of senescence by natural selection. J. Theor. Biol. 12, 12–45 (1966).

  21. A. A. Cohen, V. Legault, T. Fülöp, What if there’s no such thing as “aging”? Mech. Ageing Dev. 192, 111344 (2020).

  22. A. E. Tarkhov et al., Nature of epigenetic aging from a single-cell perspective. Nat. Aging 4, 854–870 (2024).

  23. D. H. Meyer, B. Schumacher, Aging clocks based on accumulating stochastic variation. Nat. Aging 4, 871–885 (2024).

  24. H. Tong et al., Quantifying the stochastic component of epigenetic aging. Nat. Aging 4, 886–901 (2024).

  25. B. K. Kennedy et al., Geroscience: Linking aging to chronic disease. Cell 159, 709–713 (2014).

  26. G. Kroemer et al., From geroscience to precision geromedicine: Understanding and managing aging. Cell 188, 2043–2062 (2025).

  27. C. López-Otín, M. A. Blasco, L. Partridge, M. Serrano, G. Kroemer, Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe. Cell 186, 243–278 (2023).

  28. M. D. Gurven, Seven Decades: How We Evolved to Live Longer (Princeton University Press, 2025).

  29. A. E. Tarkhov, L. I. Menshikov, P. O. Fedichev, Strehler-Mildvan correlation is a degenerate manifold of Gompertz fit. J. Theor. Biol. 416, 180–189 (2017).

  30. J. Deelen et al., A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies multiple longevity genes. Nat. Commun. 10, 3669 (2019).

  31. B. Shenhar et al., Heritability of intrinsic human life span is about 50% when confounding factors are addressed. Science 391, 504–510 (2026).

  32. L. Partridge, D. Gems, Mechanisms of ageing: Public or private? Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 165–175 (2002).

  33. D. Gems, C. C. Kern, Biological constraint, evolutionary spandrels and antagonistic pleiotropy. Ageing Res. Rev. 101, 102527 (2024).

  34. M. J. Wensink, A. A. Cohen, The Danaid theory of aging. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 671208 (2022).

  35. A. G. Golubev, Iznanka metabolizma [The other side of metabolism]. Biokhimiia 61, 2018–2039 (1996).

  36. A. Golubev, A. D. Hanson, V. N. Gladyshev, Non-enzymatic molecular damage as a prototypic driver of aging. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 6029–6038 (2017).

  37. A. Golubev, A. D. Hanson, V. N. Gladyshev, A tale of two concepts: Harmonizing the free radical and antagonistic pleiotropy theories of aging. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 29, 1003–1017 (2018).

  38. C. Kenyon, J. Chang, E. Gensch, A. Rudner, R. Tabtiang, A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature 366, 461–464 (1993).

  39. H. M. Brown-Borg, K. E. Borg, C. J. Meliska, A. Bartke, Dwarf mice and the ageing process. Nature 384, 33 (1996).

  40. R. Buffenstein et al., The naked truth: A comprehensive clarification and classification of current “myths” in naked mole-rat biology. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 97, 115–140 (2022).

  41. V. Gorbunova, A. Seluanov, Z. Zhang, V. N. Gladyshev, J. Vijg, Comparative genetics of longevity and cancer: Insights from long-lived rodents. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 531–540 (2014).

  42. E. B. Kim et al., Genome sequencing reveals insights into physiology and longevity of the naked mole rat. Nature 479, 223–227 (2011).

  43. C. Kerepesi et al., Epigenetic aging of the demographically non-aging naked mole-rat. Nat. Commun. 13, 355 (2022).

  44. S. Horvath et al., DNA methylation clocks tick in naked mole rats but queens age more slowly than nonbreeders. Nat. Aging 2, 46–59 (2022).

  45. J. G. Ruby, M. Smith, R. Buffenstein, Naked Mole-Rat mortality rates defy Gompertzian laws by not increasing with age. eLife 7, e31157 (2018).

  46. D. Firsanov et al., Evidence for improved DNA repair in the long-lived bowhead whale. Nature 648, 717–725 (2025).

  47. I. Seim et al., The transcriptome of the bowhead whale Balaena mysticetus reveals adaptations of the longest-lived mammal. Aging 6, 879–899 (2014).

  48. M. Keane et al., Insights into the evolution of longevity from the bowhead whale genome. Cell Rep. 10, 112–122 (2015).

  49. L. Guo, Genetic and genomic insights into planarian biology. Annu. Rev. Genet. 59, 315–340 (2025).

  50. A. Nebel, T. C. Bosch, Evolution of human longevity: Lessons from Hydra. Aging (Albany NY) 4, 730–731 (2012).

  51. T. V. Gladyshev, V. N. Gladyshev, A disease or not a disease? Aging as a pathology. Trends Mol. Med. 22, 995–996 (2016).

  52. L. J. E. Goeminne et al., Plasma protein-based organ-specific aging and mortality models unveil diseases as accelerated aging of organismal systems. Cell Metab. 37, 205–222.e6 (2025).

  53. J. P. de Magalhães, The evolution of cancer and ageing: A history of constraint. Nat. Rev. Cancer 25, 873–880 (2025).

  54. D. I. Podolskiy et al., The landscape of longevity across phylogeny. bioRxiv [Preprint] (2020). https:// doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.17.995993.

  55. T. V. Pyrkov et al., Longitudinal analysis of blood markers reveals progressive loss of resilience and predicts human lifespan limit. Nat. Commun. 12, 2765 (2021).

  56. S. J. Olshansky, B. J. Willcox, L. Demetrius, H. Beltrán-Sánchez, Implausibility of radical life extension in humans in the twenty-first century. Nat. Aging 4, 1635–1642 (2024).

  57. B. Zhang et al., Multi-omic rejuvenation and life span extension on exposure to youthful circulation. Nat. Aging 3, 948–964 (2023).

  58. I. M. Conboy et al., Rejuvenation of aged progenitor cells by exposure to a young systemic environment. Nature 433, 760–764 (2005).

  59. F. Galkin, B. Zhang, S. E. Dmitriev, V. N. Gladyshev, Reversibility of irreversible aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 49, 104–114 (2019).

  60. B. Zhang, A. Trapp, C. Kerepesi, V. N. Gladyshev, Emerging rejuvenation strategies—Reducing the biological age. Aging Cell 21, e13538 (2022).

  61. Y. Lu et al., Reprogramming to recover youthful epigenetic information and restore vision. Nature 588, 124–129 (2020).

  62. M. Moqri, J. R. Poganik, S. Horvath, V. N. Gladyshev, What makes biological age epigenetic clocks tick. Nat. Aging 5, 335–336 (2025).

  63. S. Fong, W. P. Koh, J. Gruber, Reframing biological age as risk-equivalent age. Nat. Aging 6, 2–5 (2026).

  64. K. Ying et al., Causality-enriched epigenetic age uncouples damage and adaptation. Nat. Aging 4, 231–246 (2024).

  65. M. E. Levine et al., An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY) 10, 573–591 (2018).

  66. A. T. Lu et al., DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY) 11, 303–327 (2019).

  67. H. S. Oh et al., Organ aging signatures in the plasma proteome track health and disease. Nature 624, 164–172 (2023).

  68. M. Moqri et al., Validation of biomarkers of aging. Nat. Med. 30, 360–372 (2024).

  69. A. Tyshkovskiy et al., Distinct longevity mechanisms across and within species and their association with aging. Cell 186, 2929–2949.e20 (2023).

  70. S. Ahadi et al., Personal aging markers and ageotypes revealed by deep longitudinal profiling. Nat. Med. 26, 83–90 (2020).

  71. A. A. Cohen et al., Balancing the promise and risks of geroscience interventions. Nat. Aging 5, 4–8 (2025).

  72. A. A. Cohen et al., A complex systems approach to aging biology. Nat. Aging 2, 580–591 (2022).

  73. K. Takahashi, S. Yamanaka, Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 126, 663–676 (2006).

  74. A. Ocampo et al., In vivo amelioration of age-associated hallmarks by partial reprogramming. Cell 167, 1719–1733.e12 (2016).

  75. S. Lore et al., Replacement as an aging intervention. Nat. Aging 5, 750–764 (2025).